Also, over the past few years I have purchased several bodies: X-A3, X-T20, X-T100, and X-T3.
I agree that I don't need to upgrade software every year, but I want to come up with a solution that will be cost-effective as I transition from being employed to being retired. I do have a calibrated monitor I use a colormunki and Displa圜al software. Other than this, you will probably simply swap annoyances. You largest challenge will be the learning curve. There is no reason you have to upgrade the applications on your Windows system unless you change cameras and have to do this to gain support.
I suggest you set up an SMB share between your Windows VM and Linux systems so you can easily switch back and forth and give it a try. If you have not worked out monitor calibration you need to address this as well. the commercial products, so I would maintain my existing Windows solution as a virtual machine until I become comfortable and confident with the other programs.įor a Fujifilm user, what are the biggest negatives of moving from Capture One, Topaz DeNoise, and Affinity Photo into a Linux-based solution? I assume the open source software has some challenges with usability and functionality vs. I am not pleased with paying fees to upgrade Capture One or Topaz each year, and I am wondering if moving to Linux versions of Darktable or Rawtherapee, along with Neat Image and GIMP, would be a reasonable solution. Overall, the photo software works fine, but I use Linux for my day-to-day computing and only use the Windows 10 system for photo work. I also have a copy of Silkypix 10 Pro, but I find it very confusing to use so I rarely launch it. I only shoot Fujifilm and use Capture One 20 along with Topaz DeNoise AI and Affinity Photo. My photo editing system is a Windows 10-based computer: an i7 with 32GB of memory and Nvidia GTX 1660s graphics card.